Wannor” reiterated that the standard of political ethics is still necessary, but it must not be so high that it is difficult to work. Tell the MP to leave the meeting often, you can do it. The Ethics Commission is preparing to speed up the investigation after the elements are complete.
Mr. Wan Muhammad Nor Mata The Chairman of the House of Representatives said in an interview about the need for ethical standards for politicians, saying that this depends on the balance of laws, but the law on ethics and ethics in society, but it may differ depending on each person, and the ethical standards of religious leaders must be high to a certain extent, just like judges, which are organizations that have to decide cases, must build credibility, must be built in another form, and the ethical standards of ambassadors who represent the country must be different, and on the part of the members of the House of Representatives and on the part of the members of the House of Representatives and the Senate, there should be st
andards, everything must be for the benefit of the people and the people. Acceptable If you don’t have it, you can’t because it will be chaotic, or if you have it and it’s too weak as nothing, it’s not good. If there is or if it is too intense, it makes it impossible to perform its duties, there is no stability in decision-making, so it does not dare to do anything. It will make the people lose benefits, so I think that everything is in the balance of whether there is a benefit to the people or not. And if there is none, and if there is none, then the people will lose benefits, there should be a
The Speaker of the House of Representatives said that the ethical standards of each organization do not have to be the same today and are currently being debated because the Constitution Article 1 129 stipulates that the Constitutional Court shall be the author of the ethical standards for the Constitutional Court and an independent organization shall It also applies to the Cabinet and members of Parliament. If you a
sk if it is good or not, but something is practiced and causes instability. This makes it impossible for government leaders to make decisions because they are not removed and are worried that they will be subjected to ethical standards, making the administration unstable. This makes people distrust the government because they are not sure how long it will last. Therefore, there should be a certain amount of stability, but ethical standards such as not cheating, not corruption. Therefore, it should be clearly stated where the standards of each profession should be to suit the status of that person.
As for whether the past behavior of political office holders should be used as a criterion in terms of ethics, Mr. Wan Muhammad Noor. He said that the problem in the case of the problem is that we did not have a clear ethical standard in the first place, but we went to the court to make a decision. However, members of Parliament should have a certain level of ethics that is not as high as the general public.
“If i
t is exceeded, it is good or not, I don’t need to say that it is good, but it is difficult to practice, the prime minister becomes the prime minister and does not dare to make any decisions, the people will definitely lose the benefits, such as the ethics of doctors, which is another matter. It’s a matter of each organization.” The Chairman of the Council said.
When asked whether a petition was filed that 84 of the 95 meetings were held, it was considered unethical. The Chairman of the House of Representatives said that it is difficult to say because it is a matter of regulations and laws that the SSA can do, but it can be checked for appropriateness and it is a responsibility, which is true that such cases are very rare because political parties have always been strict with their members in voting on various resolutions, but in this case, if there is a proposal for investigation, the matter must be brought to the Ethics Committee of the House of Representatives, which will be considered by each sub-committe
e. Ethics because the Ethics Committee consists of the Chairman of the House of Representatives of the MP faction. The government and the opposition, and there must also be an opposition leader in the House of Representatives. Previously, there was a problem that there was a lack of opposition leaders, but now there is a royal decree to favor the leader of the opposition, but there is still a problem. Personal proportions instead of alternating between them. This must be seen in the actual proportion and must be checked clearly first and must be checked clearly first, which must be in accordance with the party. Because some parties are divided into half opposition seats and half government, it must comply with the law set by the Election Commission (EC). The People’s Power is considered to be the opposition. It is expected that it should be completed soon because there are about 6-7 matters that have been submitted and will be completed by the Secretary of the Chairman of the House of Representatives to call
a meeting.
When asked. The Chairman reiterated that the person who signed the permission to leave was the Chairman of the Fact Council. said that this matter was handed over to Mr. Pichet Chaemuang Phan. The first Vice Chairman of the House is in charge of the members’ leave, although he admits that it is difficult according to the law because it requires members to take leave. If it is necessary, it is necessary, and the members say that it is necessary, attached to the mission, or unwell, there must be a reason, but where is the appropriateness, I think that the people, who choose the members, will be measurable.
As for whether there was such a large amount of leave in the past, the Chairman of the House of Representatives said that there were people who were on leave, most of whom were on leave, some of whom were MPs and ministers, or in the past, the Prime Minister was also attached to a lot of tasks, but he was not sure but not sure whether there were so many because he did not check the back, but some
of them were not both, and they were absent from the meeting, but he saw that it was a good thing that there were people who were interested in the performance of the duties of the members of the House of Representatives, who are representatives of the people. And next, it will be one of the issues that the people will see when they go to the election, so it is good that both the media and the public will check so that the function is transparent and clear.
When asked whether the investigation of this kind of matter must be summoned to clarify, Mr. Wan Muhammad Noor. He said that the inquiry is a matter for the sub-committee to ask for more information and we do not have a law to enforce it like the court that it must come to give a statement, but if the person does not come to give a statement, it must be taken according to the circumstances and the petition, which the person being asked will be at a disadvantage.
Source: Thai News Agency
