Government Center, “PDRC” is keeping an eye on ambassadors who support Move Forward Party. If they express negative opinions, they will go to protest at that embassy. They reiterate their opposition to political parties moving forward to amend Section 112.
The People’s Alliance for Democracy (PAD), led by Mr. Anon Klin-kaew, president of the PAD, traveled to listen to the court’s reading of the verdict in the case where the Election Commission (EC) filed a petition requesting the Constitutional Court to order the dissolution of the Move Forward Party and revoke the right to run for election of individuals on the party’s executive board.
Mr. Anon said that today he wanted to come and listen to the court read the verdict here because if he listened at home, it would be slow. He also wanted to know that Mr. Pita Limjaroenrat had traveled to many countries in the past. Therefore, he wanted to know if foreign ambassadors would come to listen or not. If the results come out that the Move Forward Party is dissolv
ed and they come out to express negative opinions, we will go to protest at those embassies. But he emphasized that today he did not come to cause trouble, but only to observe.
Mr. Anon added that we have no comment on the dissolution of the Move Forward Party. It depends on the court’s decision, which has no effect on us. In the past, there have been dissolutions of various parties, such as the Future Forward Party. Therefore, if today the Move Forward Party is dissolved, it is not new. However, we will not comment. Whether it is against the law or not depends on the court’s decision. If the Move Forward Party wants democracy, this time, no matter what the court decides, we must accept it as well.
When asked if the Move Forward Party was dissolved, would it give Pheu Thai more power? Mr. Anon said that they were only concerned about whether the people today would have enough to eat and use. They wanted political parties to be more concerned about the people’s livelihoods than thinking about amending Sectio
n 112.
Mr. Anon added that we have been opposing political parties that have proposed amendments or cancellations of Section 112 all along, and we have run out of ways to say it because we do not agree with this issue.
Source: Thai News Agency