Parliament, July 10 – “Dr. Ampol” reiterates his vote in support of “Pita”, adhering to the standards of 2019, supporting the majority of the party. Ignore the qualifications – fix Section 112 because it’s not the duty of the senator.
Dr. Amphon Chindawatana, a member of the Senate (Senator) reiterates the original principle to vote for political parties that include more than half of the majority in the House of Commons. to be prime minister whoever it is Didn’t look at the person or any party Because it is considered the voice of the people who have been elected, it must be respected and the same principles and reasons for choosing the prime minister in 2019. Today, there is no reason to set yourself up to check the prime minister before voting. Or do anything that obstructs the voice of the people, confirming that it has never been coordinated by the far-reaching party. And he was not involved in politics because he was a recruiting senator and in 2019 the senator had already been elected. I didn’t see anything checked. because he voted for the party with a majority of more than 250 people to be prime minister The standard already exists. This trip will vote for anyone who has to vote according to the old standard.
As for the amendment of Section 112, whether it will be a factor to vote or not, Dr. Amphon said that the original principle was plus according to the people’s vote. Other matters were not taken into account. because it is elected to the position of Prime Minister As for political parties, what laws will be proposed? It’s a future legislative step. And many political parties want to introduce a law. should look at all Not just one party And if a law is proposed that is against the constitution, it cannot be done. But if it is in accordance with the constitution, it must go through the process of accepting the principles through the opinion of the majority. which is not related to voting for the Prime Minister, so if it is linked that he should not be Prime Minister thought it was overdue Because the duty now is to respect the voice of the people. There’s no reason not to choose. because the majority of the people elected to enter have to respect the voice Otherwise, why vote? If other reasons were taken to negate the majority vote It will not be a democracy based on elections.
The part that was criticized The person who had turned off the senator switch today changed his position to vote. Senators who voted to turn off the switch Senators elect prime minister if democracy I see that if it is a true democracy, senators who are not elected should let 500 MPs decide. He therefore voted in agreement every time it was proposed to turn off the switch, and almost 30 fellow senators agreed, but in the past this section could not be amended, so today it has a constitutional duty. From now on, I have to vote for the prime minister.
For the case where the Election Commissioner (EC) will summarize Mr. Pita’s qualifications In the case of holding ITV shares Before deciding whether to send it to the Constitutional Court or not, Dr. Ampol said what would be considered is another issue. but personally insisted on still adhering to the principle of the voice of the people As for other matters, it is not a reason to consider electing the Prime Minister.-Thai News Agency
Source: Thai News Agency