Constitutional Court 29 May – The Constitutional Court unanimously rejects the request for digital currency policy – “Thaksin” directs the party – appointing a person disqualified to sit as minister, which is considered to be using civil liberties to overthrow the government. Judging only different opinions and facts.
The Constitutional Court passed a unanimous decision. Ordered not to accept the request for consideration and decision in the case in which Mr. Kongdecha Chairat asked the Constitutional Court to decide according to Section 49 of the Constitution that the actions of the Pheu Thai Party who adopted the policy of giving out 10,000 baht digital wallets to use in the election campaign for MPs, causing election votes not to come from the true will of the people It is an action to gain power to govern a country that is unconstitutional. and having the behavior of allowing Mr. Thaksin Shinawatra to direct the activities of political parties Makes the exercise of freedom to form a political party not
legal. Actions of the Cabinet that adopted the policy of distributing 10,000 baht digital wallets for use in government administration. without explaining the source of income It is characterized by unfair discrimination against individuals. Contrary to or contradict the constitution Actions of Mr. Settha Thavisin, Prime Minister, in the administration of the country that does not provide correct and complete factual information to the people. Acting as an online mass media which is a prohibited characteristic of the Minister and is involved in the process of appointing unqualified persons to hold ministerial positions. It is a violation or non-compliance with ethical standards. and the actions of Mr. Thaksin Shinawatra that may guide the activities of the Pheu Thai Party Contrary to or contradict the Constitution and related laws. which is the use of political rights or freedom to overthrow the democratic regime of government with the monarchy He is head of state. According to the Constitution, Section 49, p
aragraph one
The Constitutional Court considered by discussion and found that the facts as per the request Additional requests and supporting documents There were no clear enough facts or evidence. And it is still far beyond the reasons that can be shown that All of the respondents committed any acts that were an exercise of their rights or freedoms to overthrow the democratic regime of government with the King as Head of State. According to the first paragraph of the Constitution, Section 49, the petition is only an expression of the petitioner’s different opinions.
Source: Thai News Agency