“Chatchai” points out that “Pita” is not wrong if he holds shares in the name of the inheritance manager.

Miscellaneous

A former spokesperson for the CDC pointed out that in the case of “Pita” holding ITV shares, the facts must be looked at. If regarded as the administrator of the estate Not owning real shares does not qualify as a lack of qualifications And this case is an individual matter. Do not attach a certified party member along with specifying that the leading party forming a government has 151 votes, it will be negotiated And every party wants to be the chairman of the council.

Mr. Chatchai Na Chiang Mai, former president of the National Institute of Development Administration (Nida) and a former spokesman for the Constitution Drafting Committee (CDC) referring to the reported case that Mr. Phitha Lim Chareonrat Candidate for the Prime Minister and leader of the Progressive Party Sell ITV stock 4,200 shares already since May, which probably won’t affect that prime qualification. According to the constitution, a candidate for election to the House of Representatives must not own shares. Therefore, it must be viewed on the day of the election. On that day, if the qualifications are not complete then show null can not apply which on the day of applying for that election The person must write to certify that the information I filled in the application is true in all respects. Therefore, on the day of applying for election if you know or careless Didn’t know that he was already holding media shares and went to apply for election when the ECT If found later, it will have to be disqualified. because the qualifications are not complete However, must also look at the details that the person applying for the shareholding on behalf of the person or shares fall to him as the trustee If as a trustee It was a matter of court order that the things of the inheritance would be under his name. But it doesn’t mean inheritance or stock ownership. considered not applicable

As for the question that if Mr. Phitha sells his shares before Election Day The Election Commission must refer the case to the Supreme Court or the Constitutional Court. A former spokesman for the ACT said first it would have to see if the shares with information belonging to Mr. Pita belonged to Mr. Pita personally. bought from the beginning or belongs to him in the name of the trustee must be separated If it is a share as the trustee considered that he did not hold shares and does not own shares It is only by law to take care of the shares that are inherited by the father. which, if this is the case, is considered Mr. Phitha does not belong to the category of holding shares and is not guilty and is not lacking in qualifications as a candidate for MPs and a candidate for the Prime Minister.

“In fact, I don’t know the details of where this stock came from and how, if it was his father’s inheritance. and did not write a will Or if it is written, you have to look at who it is given to. and if not given to anyone Children and grandchildren must come to an agreement on who will take this share of inheritance. Which probably hasn’t been dealt with yet, I don’t know, but if it’s the case that he’s the trustee of the stock as the trustee and the stock hasn’t been divided. considered that he was not yet the shareholder Just a trustee But the stock is his father’s inheritance.

Not his, I don’t know the details. Let’s talk about the facts and the law. That the intent of this section is just that. That is, I don’t want politicians or anyone to apply to be an MP to hold media shares. Because holding media shares has the opportunity to use the media for you to blame yourself. and competitors Therefore, if a trustee considered not the owner of the shares, “Mr. Chatchai said.

Mr. Chatchai said that before submitting the case to any court for decision. The Election Commission must request evidence from Mr. Phitha. Or call Mr. Phitha to give an explanation. to find out the facts and diagnose here first If there is evidence, it will be sent to the court for further ruling. If there is no evidence, the court will not accept the petition.

As for the story with the singing of Mr. Phitha Should the decision be completed before the Prime Minister is elected or not? and at the Constitutional Court which the court would have to see if there was evidence, it would have to speed up the consideration because it will affect the administration of state affairs Otherwise it may cause damage to the public.

For the case where it was noted that if the court ruled that Mr. Phitha was disqualified because he held media shares It may affect the MP candidate who signed the certification as the leader of that party, Mr. Chatchai said, depending on the interpretation. If the person is disqualified, it is considered a personal fault. If going to endorse the candidate as party leader It shouldn’t have an effect on other people. Because according to the constitution, it is written individually If referred to doing something wrong, it is a personal matter.

Mr. Chatchai also mentioned that the Kao Kao Party is in the process of forming a government whether it will succeed or not. It’s difficult to answer. because power is what politicians want and wants to be a government Each side would have a bargaining technique. Because the number one party has 151 votes, it may have to surrender to the second party. in order to form a government And believes that the position of Speaker of the House of Representatives that has not yet been settled is considered a “hot spot” because it is an important position to hold a parliamentary meeting to elect a prime minister. and is the one who arranges the agenda for the council Therefore, if any law that the President sees as any law that affects the country may not be included in the agenda As a result, political parties want to get this position.- Thai News Agency

Source: Thai News Agency